The value of having non-formal learning recognised - NCVER
People who have used recognition of their non-formal learning to gain entry into formal study say their confidence increased as a result of the process. But research by Larry Smith and Berwyn Clayton reveals that many people remain unaware that the RPL option even exists.
The researchers wanted to broaden understanding of recognition processes by talking to people who have had direct experiences with RPL (recognition of prior learning). They interviewed 72 people from Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory. All were undertaking or had completed a formal qualification or award by using a recognition pathway.
“This research has given individuals an opportunity to voice their views on what worked and didn’t work for them,” says Clayton.
Everyone indicated that the major benefit of RPL was the significant increase in self-esteem they experienced.
“While undergoing the recognition process, the learners came to realise just how much they had already achieved and knew, and how much they felt capable of doing,” says Smith.
Many people remain unaware that recognition of non-formal learning is an option for them. The study also emphasises the point that the language associated with recognition processes discourages people from taking advantage of it.
“How can we expect people to apply for RPL when they don’t understand what it means?,” Clayton asks. “Somehow, we have to simplify the language.”
NCVER is synthesising recent research on informal learning in a soon-to-be-released At a glance publication, which explains what is encompassed by the term and discusses when it may be advantageous to recognise informal learning. To be alerted when this becomes available, subscribe to NCVER News at www.ncver.edu.au/newsevents/news.html.
Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Participant insights and perspectives is available atwww.ncver.edu.au/publications/2084.html
The researchers wanted to broaden understanding of recognition processes by talking to people who have had direct experiences with RPL (recognition of prior learning). They interviewed 72 people from Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory. All were undertaking or had completed a formal qualification or award by using a recognition pathway.
“This research has given individuals an opportunity to voice their views on what worked and didn’t work for them,” says Clayton.
Everyone indicated that the major benefit of RPL was the significant increase in self-esteem they experienced.
“While undergoing the recognition process, the learners came to realise just how much they had already achieved and knew, and how much they felt capable of doing,” says Smith.
Many people remain unaware that recognition of non-formal learning is an option for them. The study also emphasises the point that the language associated with recognition processes discourages people from taking advantage of it.
“How can we expect people to apply for RPL when they don’t understand what it means?,” Clayton asks. “Somehow, we have to simplify the language.”
NCVER is synthesising recent research on informal learning in a soon-to-be-released At a glance publication, which explains what is encompassed by the term and discusses when it may be advantageous to recognise informal learning. To be alerted when this becomes available, subscribe to NCVER News at www.ncver.edu.au/newsevents/news.html.
Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Participant insights and perspectives is available atwww.ncver.edu.au/publications/2084.html



« Home